This is an occasional series describing (anonymously) a real challenge faced by one of my PI® clients in Ohio & Michigan and my recommendation to them.
Please let me know what topics you’d like to see included in this ADVISA series.
Scenario: A sales manager for an electric motor manufacturer has two outside salespeople with similar PI patterns but vastly different sales results.
PI® Patterns
Successful Salesperson – Persuasive Sales/Management Reference Pattern, Very High B, Very Low C, Moderately High A, Moderately Low D
Unsuccessful Salesperson – Persuasive Sales/Management Reference Pattern, High B, Low C, High A, Low D (A & D both about 1 tick-mark from the Norm)
The Issue: The sales manager had used Predictive Index as a pre-employment assessment to select these two salespeople. The PRO for the position is a Persuasive Sales/Management Reference Pattern and both salespeople match this pattern. Why is one person successful and the other is not?
PI® Analysis and Recommendation: While both salespeople have PIs that match the general pattern of a Persuasive Reference Pattern (Highest B, Lowest C, High A, Low D) there is an important difference between the two PIs that could explain the performance difference. The difference has to do with the “Sigma” or spread of the two PIs.
The successful salesperson has a much wider spread to his pattern. His B Drive is Very High (over one Sigma high) and his C Drive is Very Low (over one Sigma low). In addition, the spread between his High A & Low D (a measure of comfort with risk in decision making that is linked to sales-closing performance) is several times wider than his unsuccessful colleague.
The stronger measures on these PI factors means the successful salesperson feels the key drives needed for this position more intensely and should exhibit more-impactful behaviors related to the job. The sales environment for these outside salespeople is very demanding – strong competitors constantly threatened to undercut them and their industrial customers have very demanding purchasers. In the face of these pressures, the stronger personality performs more effectively.
I recommended they include drive strength as a key element in their future decisions on assignments.