Why sales managers fear sales training, but shouldn’t…and what it can cost the company.

At first glance this title may seem counter intuitive.  Why wouldn’t sales managers and sales training fit together like a hand and a glove?  On the surface, as people who are often responsible for the productivity of the sales team, it seems that programs that could lead to improvement would be something they would scout out, welcome.  Sometimes, they do. Often times, they don’t.  Why?

The answer is quite simple.  One, it raises the expectation of results.  For lots of folks, this is somewhat subconscious but very real.

Two, getting different results requires new behaviors.  Yup.  You can’t pick up a magazine and get six-pack abs or look like a model.  That takes work.  We have to behave differently than we have been.  And getting different results from salespeople requires different behaviors from their managers too.  This only begins at training, it doesn’t end there.  Management has to reinforce new skills over time.

Investing time and money – even if these are far exceeded by the potential return – can feel risky, which can lead to inaction.  And another year without the growth you’re looking for.  It shouldn’t.

If you are a sales manager, or own a company, and are looking to increase sales this year, here are three reasons to consider implementing a sales program, not fear it:

  1. Sales trainers and training DON’T replace sales managers. – There is a relationship between a sales manager that is very different from that they will have with a sales trainer.  The daily motivation from someone who understands their business from the inside; knows their colleagues and has empathy for what it takes to truly get the job done – and reinforce sales skills – is the role of a sales manager.
  2. Some sales people improve a little, some improve a lot.  Consider where each of your sales people are right now in terms of their sales skills.  Some don’t have a lot to learn.  Others might. (Properly assessing where your folks are and what each individual does need, in terms of development, puts you in an even better place.)  What if your top salesperson increased their sales by closing just one or two more big deals a year?  Or, how about closing the gap between your best and average performers?  Getting those average performers closer to the top could have a HUGE impact!  What needs improvement, and in what area of the sales process, varies.  Either way, your investment in a good sales program is likely to be exceeded exponentially by what you paid for it.
  3. The return on your investment in sales training will keep on giving over time, but the results won’t be immediate.  Knowledge is something you get to keep.  Once your people learn and develop new skills, you’ll continue to see an improvement in the results you get.  It’s about growth, not flipping a switch.  If you keep your expectations reasonable, and commit to reinforcing them, you will see the improvement.  Without the commitment, yes, it’s a waste of money – like new exercise equipment or anything else.  It does have to be used.  But if you do use it, wow!

So if you want to increase sales, the question isn’t really whether or not you should invest in a sales training program, assuming you find a good one.  Instead, the question is, “Are you willing to commit to it?”  Nothing worth having is easy to get.  Rock hard abs – and sales growth – included.

Strength of Personality Key to Outside Sales Success

This is an occasional series describing (anonymously) a real challenge faced by one of my PI® clients in Ohio & Michigan and my recommendation to them.

Please let me know what topics you’d like to see included in this ADVISA series.

Scenario: A sales manager for an electric motor manufacturer has two outside salespeople with similar PI patterns but vastly different sales results.

PI® Patterns

Successful Salesperson – Persuasive Sales/Management Reference Pattern, Very High B, Very Low C, Moderately High A, Moderately Low D

Unsuccessful Salesperson – Persuasive Sales/Management Reference Pattern, High B, Low C, High A, Low D (A & D both about 1 tick-mark from the Norm)

The Issue: The sales manager had used Predictive Index as a pre-employment assessment to select these two salespeople. The PRO for the position is a Persuasive Sales/Management Reference Pattern and both salespeople match this pattern. Why is one person successful and the other is not?

PI® Analysis and Recommendation: While both salespeople have PIs that match the general pattern of a Persuasive Reference Pattern (Highest B, Lowest C, High A, Low D) there is an important difference between the two PIs that could explain the performance difference. The difference has to do with the “Sigma” or spread of the two PIs.

The successful salesperson has a much wider spread to his pattern. His B Drive is Very High (over one Sigma high) and his C Drive is Very Low (over one Sigma low). In addition, the spread between his High A & Low D (a measure of comfort with risk in decision making that is linked to sales-closing performance) is several times wider than his unsuccessful colleague.

The stronger measures on these PI factors means the successful salesperson feels the key drives needed for this position more intensely and should exhibit more-impactful behaviors related to the job. The sales environment for these outside salespeople is very demanding – strong competitors constantly threatened to undercut them and their industrial customers have very demanding purchasers. In the face of these pressures, the stronger personality performs more effectively.

I recommended they include drive strength as a key element in their future decisions on assignments.

A Customer Focused Sales Process

Todd,

I really loved the training and it has already made a huge difference for me. I have been in advertising sales for a long time and implemented the consultative sales approach.  I have been through consultative sales training before but I learned a lot more in general and most importantly how to implement it for South Central A|V through your training. I have been with the company a year now and was having trouble transitioning consultative sales techniques from advertising to selling specific products and services. I am confident that I will proceed with much more success now that you have helped me to understand that this approach can work with the products and services I represent now.

Thank you for making me a consultant again,

S.

I posted this note because it demonstrates that the transition from product sales to a consultative sales approach is not easy, even for successful, seasoned sales professionals.  For me this note stressed the importance of building good sales process training into your sales training curriculum.   A process that can be understood, implemented, practiced, and repeated is critical to transitioning a sales force to a consultative sales approach.

Want to learn more about this client (they do GREAT work), click below:

www.southcentralav.com

Stop presenting to me and start talking to me.

The successful sales call has involved into a conversation and if you are still stuck in the practice of simply presenting your goods and services you are going to experience more and more difficulty in connecting with new prospects.  If you adopt a consultative sales approach and build your corporate sales training curriculum around that approach you will improve sales skills within your sales staff.  You want to teach the skills to sit across from prospects and have a real discussion.  The following is high-level view of a consultative sales approach:

  1. Building creditability and trust
  2. Investigating the prospects world
  3. Presenting only what addresses the needs uncovered in your investigation
  4. Gaining commitment for next steps
  5. Building an ongoing relationship

By following a process like this in a disciplined way you will find your sales calls will become a relaxed, engaging conversation.   The often unexpected benefit from sales people who are firmly rooted in their style is that the conversion to the consultative sales approach is that the call becomes easier, more enjoyable, and dramatically more successful.  For obvious reasons it seems to be hardest to get the most successful sales people to alter their proven approach.  Additionally sales managers are least likely to mess with what their top producers are doing.  Unfortunately history is propagated with great success stories that were on top of their game and did not see change coming.  With so many people wanting our time there has likely never been more truth to the old adage “I don’t care what you know until I know that you care.”

Breaking out of “all or nothing” mode

Several little experiences this week have made me think about the “all or nothing” mode that we can get mentally stuck in.

  • An HR Director I was talking with was set on making three new hires because he’d lost three employees earlier this year during downsizing.  The company doesn’t have the money to do three hires and he was lamenting that they couldn’t do anything.  Really?  We talked through what the company could do.  Are two hires possible?  How could work be divided differently with two people? Solutions quickly began to emerge.
  • This perils of “all or nothing” mode also came up when I read Doug Karr’s posting about The Most Important Skill Salespeople Need to Learn.  He demonstrates why rather than try to sell the moon (the “all”), we should listen to what the customer is asking for.  In the consulting world, I see this all the time.  It’s easy to get caught up visioning the eight problems we could fix rather than the one that the client has asked for help with.  I’ve certainly fallen into this trap and then it really is an “all or nothing” because the client gets annoyed, overwhelmed, impatient (all completely understandable) and buys into nothing.
  • In my own continual quest for successful strategic planning, I get stuck thinking that I can’t move forward until I have absolutely everything figured out and packaged in a pretty box with a bow on top.  I’m doing a lot of work right now getting ready for 2010 and am continually challenging myself to let go of the pretty box and a bow: do good planning and then MOVE!

The “all or nothing” rut is one I have to work not to get lost in, so it’s something I think about a lot.  Below are some ways I deal with it.

  1. Talk it up – Find a “thinking partner” who will help me thinking through the roadblocks I’ve created.
  2. Get moving – Go for a walk/run/bike ride.
  3. Take a road trip – I might even plan a trip to visit a client who is a couple of hours away when I know I need some real “think time.”
  4. Visual reminders – I can’t live without a white board in my office.  Often it has a message such as, “No bow necessary!” or “What CAN I do?” written in red to help me keep perspective.
  5. Listen to someone else’s challenges – Sometimes listening to a colleague talk through an issue will generate creative thought that I can apply in my own world.

Maybe others of you will find this useful when you’re stuck in this mindset whether in your work world (dealing with staff motivation, developing hiring plans, implementing strategic planning, etc.) to your personal world (buying a house, planning a trip, etc.).  I’d love to hear your perspective on “all or nothing” as well!

How do you feel about being sold?

Are you trying to sell me or are you trying to help me?  Here’s the key to that question, it really does not matter what you think the answer is.  It only matters what the prospect thinks.  If you are talking about your products and services there is a good chance you are trying to sell me and you can get in line with the rest of the sales people I do not have time to talk to.  Your products/services should not be the focus of the conversation they should only be brought up as answer to a challenge that your prospect has already shared.   Unless you have unpacked their challenges/issues/problems/goals/objectives during the investigation phase of the sales call and are only presenting based what you can directly connect back to those discoveries then you are product selling not consultative selling.

Consultative selling is truly a process.  It is a process that can be taught in a good consultative sales training program and it can be repeated during each interaction with a customer or prospect.  Do you know the phases of the process?  Do you know how to assess the skills of your sales staff in each phase of the process?  How much of your sales training curriculum is focused on product knowledge and how much is focused on the process of a true consultative selling process?

Sales has gotten a black eye because to many people make it about what they are selling and little time is spent exploring what I, as a customer, need.  Training sales people to ask questions, listen, and investigate is one of the toughest jobs sales managers have.  Sales people are usually excited about what they are selling and they have the gift of gab.  One of the most difficult things to accomplish in sales coaching is to teach your sales staff to never miss a really good opportunity to shut up.  When your prospects understand you truly want to help you will not only get invited in, you will get invited back.