Two reasons why your best 30 something employee is about to quit you

Young employees can be the most productive, energetic and powerful group in your organization.  However, they are leaving companies earlier than ever.  Why?

  1. Lack of training opportunities
  2. Lack of mentors

Read on:

Multiple studies find that today’s younger workers have absolutely no intention of sticking around if they don’t feel like they’re learning, growing and being valued in a job. Beth N. Carver, a consultant who has spent 12 years researching exit interviews, finds that a loss of training opportunities and a lack of mentors in the workplace are two of the biggest reasons why young workers leave.

Read more: http://anniemurphypaul.com/2012/09/why-workers-leave-its-usually-not-about-the-money/#ixzz27UJ6thaH

At ADVISA, we provide our clients with a dozen modular training opportunities focused on leadership development, frontline management skill development, sales skill development and behavioral intelligence focused on gaining influence and providing coaching/mentoring in the work place.  If you have programs like these in place for your employees, pat yourself on the back because you are investing in the right place.  If not, reach out to me and learn what programs we have installed at client companies like yours to take care of their best and brightest 30 somethings.

Learn more about BJ McKay here. 

Caging Your Personal Bias

It’s 2:30 PM in a small office within a larger office building.  Sharon has arrived for her interview with GPX software.  She is greeted by Kathryn and Rick who will be interviewing her for the next couple of hours.  The conversation is focused 100% on Sharon, her work experience, her successes and failures, and her personal outlook on the future.  Then, she is permitted to ask a few questions about the firm, which she does.  All parties leave the interview feeling like they accomplished something, and Sharon is to expect a call within the next few days to determine what next steps would be should she be selected for the position.

 

The above scenario sounds standard right?  There is a big missing piece to the interview story above.  Read it again.  Did you see it this time?  It’s the fact that GPX software is not interviewing Sharon at all; Kathryn and Rick are.  Kathryn and Rick are not the company; they are human beings with their own stories, parents, siblings, friends, families, and successes and failures.  Sharon is being interviewed through the personal bias of Kathryn and Rick, like it or not.

 

Bias is defined as: Prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.  This is a part of all of us.  It cannot be separated from who we are, as we have built it up over the course of our lives.  It is a byproduct of the thin-slicing that we do to make sense of the world and operate in it efficiently.  Bias comes from our family, our neighborhood growing up, our school, and our successes and failures.  It is meant to keep us safe from potential threats in our environment.

 

Sharon, in this case, is not a threat in Kathryn or Rick’s environment.  Or is she?  Did Sharon work with or know a former colleague of Kathryn?  Did she attend a rival college of Rick’s and achieve more material success than he?  Is Sharon the daughter of Kathryn’s favorite teacher and mentor from college?  These and many other bias’ are a major factor in the interview process, and in the social circles within a workplace.  Regardless of your intelligence and experience, bias is tattooed in each of us.

 

How can we objectively measure and judge someone else with this type of handicap for the job?

 

The answer rests in proven, reliable, and valid data that is tested against these biases.  A tool that can dive deeper into the invisible drives, motivations, and sources of confidence for each individual.  Each of us is motivated to move toward activities, relationships, communities, and endeavors that feed our self-confidence.  This can be accurately measured in minutes via proven behavioral assessment tools.  The purpose of these assessments is NOT to stereotype people and let us know what they cannot do.   Quite the contrary.  Behavioral assessments provide us the insight to ask more relevant questions, free from our own bias.  They provide us deep insight into the invisible drives that motivate us to do what we do everyday.  Ultimately, when applied appropriately, they provide each of us an opportunity to do what we do best, they way we are hardwired to want to do it.

 

How does that sound? The next time you line up an interview, see if the company cares enough about avoiding personal bias in the hiring process by offering a behavioral assessment.  If they do, pay attention to the relevance of the questions you are asked during the interview.  Odds are you will walk away feeling like the process was warm and respectful of who you actually are, rather than an uncomfortable grill session or a soft chat that doesn’t bear any relevance to the job.

 

If you are currently using  behavioral assessments to remove bias in the hiring process THANK YOU.  You are ahead of the curve and should be commended for adopting best practices in the hiring process.  If you have not considered behavioral assessments in your hiring process consider reaching out to me today for a complimentary assessment and professional feedback on the results.

 

Time to go; your job candidate, Sharon, has arrived at the front desk and she is ready for her interview.

Hiring a Social Media Manager?

Social media management is an emerging role within organizations around the globe.  I consider it emerging because at this point organizations have learned that it must be a part of their growth plan, because most companies are impacted by social media whether they contribute or not.  Why not help manage and craft the stories being written about your company?  That is the role of social.

Hiring a social media community manager, or any variation, can be difficult for a number of reasons.  It takes the right kind of person to be permanently successful in that role.  The type of person who ends up applying, and in many cases being selected for, the job are candidates who like the “idea” of being a social media manager.  Then when the time comes to actually do the job, they struggle to do it, then do their own variation of the job, or something different entirely.Here is a run down list for a successful social position:

  • Solid background in the dynamics of social media and platforms; command of those platforms
  • Ability to work for long periods of time communicating through emails and social media platforms (not talking or meeting with people face to face)
  • Ability to process, analyze, and problem solve with social data and metrics
  • Have a track record and desire to follow through efficiently every time with everything
  • Have some built in “worrying” in their hardwiring; worrying about getting things done right; worrying about the messages/stories
  • Fully embrace, understand, and have command of the organizations personality, language, mission, vision, and values


The people that end up with these positions tend to interview terrific, have stellar references, but end up on doing the job they were hired to do.  They are social people, which is the real crutch given the nature of the actual work that must be done everyday.  They tend to want interaction in person and verbal.  They actually communicate best that way.  Working in teams or groups is preferred.  The challenge is that the jobs in social are more heads down and data focused.  It is typically not a good fit, therefore the lifespan of that person in this role is short and usually unproductive for all parties.

Now, there are exceptions, but the work I’ve done with my clients who specialize in this area have found that my assertions above hold up, and significantly increase the retention, productivity, and job satisfaction of those individuals, their teammates, and their managers.  The reason is simple, they are hardwired to behave in a way that is in alignment with what the work demands.  Doing what I would do naturally is what my job and my manager needs from me everyday in the role of social.

If you have questions about this analysis/observation, and feel I and our Predictive Index® tools may be useful to you in finding the right fit for this vital role at your company please reach out.

Why did I do that?

Remember the last meeting you had with your team where you walked out and asked yourself: “Why did I do that?”  It could be in response to something you said, how you handled a conflict situation, or how you attempted to motivate your team to action.

Regardless of the specifics, I want you to remember that feeling.  The feeling that you logically knew what to do and say in that moment, but for whatever reason you did the opposite.

All managers, even the great ones, have these moments.  This post is about what separates the good from the great in these moments that happen everyday.  I am going to stand on the shoulders of a great researcher as I work to earn my point here.
These moments tend to happen most when there is a lot going on in our immediate environment – immediate being in our current physical surroundings, as well as in our minds.  The human response to this situation is being frazzled, for lack of a better term.

The basic neurobiology of frazzle reflects the body’s default plan for emergency.  When we are under stress, the HPA axis roars into action, preparing the body for crisis.  Among other biological maneuvers, the amygdala commandeers the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s executive center.  This shift in control to the low road favors automatic habits, as the amygdala draws on knee-jerk responses to save us.  The thinking brain gets sidelined for the duration; the high road moves too slowly. (Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. Daniel Goleman. 2006.  p. 268)

I underlined “automatic habits” above because this is where the primal part of us takes over the rational part of our brains.  We are, in the truest sense, no longer thinking at all. We are simply reacting to perceived threats in our environment.  The good news here is that all people have this hard-wiring.  Here is the not so good news…

The greater the anxiety we feel, the more impaired is the brain’s cognitive efficiency.  In this zone of mental misery, distracting thoughts hijack our attention and squeeze our cognitive resources.  Because high anxiety shrinks the space available to our attention, it undermines our very capacity to take in new information, let alone generate fresh ideas.  Near-panic is the enemy of learning and creativity.

Now, do you get a better sense of “why did I do that?”  In my world of behavioral science and analytics, it has been proven that these primal or natural instincts are hard-wired into us.  We are not all the same and will respond differently in this frazzled state.  However, the key to unlocking our mastery of these moments and conditioning ourselves to act logically when our mind and body is fleeing to the primal low-road, is in uncovering that hard-wiring in ourselves – and then, uncovering it in others we work for, work with, and whom work for us.

Therefore, if you are in a high-pressure sales environment, stop wondering why your reps are not learning and coming up with creative selling solutions. High-pressure and over-worked production lines? Same message.  Knowing how to best manage your people requires knowledge that we cannot gain without the use of science and valid instruments.  Now, reach out to me at ADVISA if you want the answer to the question:  Why did I do that?

A critical flaw in your strategic plan. How will you address it?

Most companies gather their leadership team once per year to discuss strategic planning.  This is a time-honored event that, in many cases, produces little tangible result. There is often recreation, along with retreat from the day-to-day grind of running the business, but actions and behaviors typically stay the same when those key executives return to the job. There are likely many reasons for this, but one that I encounter most often is that the actual talent within the company – the same talent that will ultimately produce the outcomes drawn up during the strategic planning retreat – were not included and were poorly assessed.

Strategic plans drawn up in a (relative) vacuum can be dangerous vehicles for de-motivating employees and setting them on a path to an unrealistic goal. It is a tragic management mistake to tell high performers in any role that they are consistently behind and on a collision course for failure. This unnecessarily taxes and drains key people and leaves them with a half-tank of gas to finish the race. Often, the strategic plan itself becomes a key lever for lack of energy and lack of motivation leading to poor results.

Has your strategic plan produced these outcomes? Here is how to fix it:

1) Start with real data on the people responsible for the goals within the strategic plan. We use Predictive Index® at ADVISA as a foundational element of our strategic/organizational planning process. By understanding the hard-wiring and makeup of employees, our clients avoid guessing about how to motivate their people and how to foster an environment where their employees can produce.

2) Start with real data on your company’s past performance in the key areas that will be measured as a benchmark for success. Often, leadership can explain away poor results, feign accountability, and say “next year will be nothing like last year.” This is a critical mistake. Facing at the truth – which is often in the numbers – can provide a realistic framework to take “one step at a time” in the near-term. Know that your benchmarks are realistic before codifying the strategic plan for distribution, otherwise you risk a real morale and energy drain by teeing your people up for failure.

3) Use a competent, credible, and trusted third-party consultant to facilitate your strategic planning. At ADVISA, we have been involved in strategic planning for over 20 years, facilitating for many industries. Our team of management consultants is sharp, experienced, and trained in expert facilitation. While we are partial to our own team, there are many credible and talented facilitators in the marketplace. Avoid trying to feign objectivity by running your own strategic planning.  This can be reckless. And it is unfair to place key executives – especially those who have bought in to the company – in a position to operate as if they can be clearly objective facilitators. These are people who have key performance metrics that will inevitably cloud their vision. This focus is what makes them special at their jobs, and allows them to be key contributors within the strategic planning session. However, if they are asked to facilitate a strategic plan, this becomes a crutch.

If you are interested in learning how I, and our team at ADVISA, can assist you and your management team in strategic planning please call us at 317.249.2258. If you already have a trusted facilitator, consider sharing this post and looking critically at the people that will make your strategic plan successful.

 

ADVISA at the Super Bowl 2012 Social Media Command Center

This year’s Super Bowl is going to be more social than any in the history of the sport, and my client Raidious will be the epicenter of this activity. They are the Social Media Command Center for Super Bowl 2012 in Indianapolis. Last night we had an exclusive event to hear the strategy that Raidious will be employing through @superbowl2012 on Twitter. Taulbee Jackson, Brian Wyrick, Ryan Smith and the entire team shared the excitement and all the work that will go into serving the masses that will be in Indianapolis during Super Bowl week.

Here is a local and a national story that have been written about this first ever initiative:

WTHR -

Mashable -

There is a Bloomberg article around the corner that I’ll share when it’s posted. It has been rewarding working with the talented team at Raidious and they continue to be a case study in the application of Predictive Index® in hiring and in management development.

@superbowl2012 on Twitter is where you need to be from now through Super Sunday.

 

Everyone hates the decision maker

If you are the decision maker in your business, people will hate you.

Do you agree with this?

The decision maker is a position that many seek as they build their careers, but often when the position is earned it, comes with far more scrutiny and far less enjoyment than anticipated. So, why do we constantly seek the decision-maker positions? The reason, as usual, is simple and strikes to the heart of each of us as human beings. The answer is that power is attractive and motivating, especially for men.

Let me take this a level deeper. Historically in America, men have been nurtured to be decision makers, to want to make more money than their peers, and to strive for greatness and power as a key criteria for success. This can be validated and documented easily over the past 100 years. This has lead to difficult circumstances for many managers, executives, and other leaders in decision-making roles. The fact that I may not want to be the decision maker usually hits home after I have already won the position of decision maker. Now what do I do?

There is no clear path out of a misfit position, or job requirement. It’s a messy situation at any angle of approach. The key is to not end up in a role that will not equal personal success.  Do this by striving for true self-awareness and self-acceptance. Without those valuable virtues it will be difficult to effectively navigate yourself to true success.

Too often, a decision maker is chosen or promoted because she/he is popular among management and peers. However, when the role is assumed, guess what happens to that popularity?

Take five minutes today to reflect on these two questions about being the decision maker:

  1. Do I enjoy having the final say and accountability for decision making?
  2. Am I truly self-aware? If yes, have I accepted myself?

 

Self-discipline and reinforcement are keys to effective training

Training can be wasteful and worthless for you and your employees.  Training takes time.  Costs money.  Takes key people out of the job for a period of time.  If you wanted to list out the reasons not to do training you could produce a nice-sized list even longer than this one.

Effective training involves two variables every time:
  1. Self-discipline
  2. Reinforcement
Without those two variables, training can be a waste.  The two variables are in order of importance as well.  Consider the changes in your own life - the important lessons that have stuck with you to this day.  What is consistent with each of them?  Likely, self-discipline and reinforcement were involved in all scenarios.
Without self-discipline our behaviors do not want to change.  As human beings we have the distinct ability to say “no” or “yes” to things our bodies/minds want.  Breaking habits developed over time are not easy.  Our bodies want to continue doing what they’ve been doing.  Self-discipline is the opposite force that must be larger than the habit.  Over time, the need to exert self-discipline lessens as the new behaviors firmly take the place of the old behaviors.  Self-discipline is a limited supply resource in that we only have so much of to dole out.
Reinforcement is the other critical piece of the equation for effective training.  This is the outside influence or accountability that keeps us, or our employees, on the new behavior path.
Consider New Year’s resolutions as a great example of reinforcement.  Andrea decides that after New Year’s Day she is going to go to the gym every day and give up soda.  For the first week, she makes it happen.  Then the following week she skips two days because “something came up”.  Then in week three of the new year she only goes once because “things just got busy”.  Then in week four all behaviors are back to “normal” for Andrea.  There was no reinforcement to produce the new desired behaviors.  The self-discipline alone ran out after one week, which can be typical.  She lacked outside accountability to shore her up.  Most of us need a person or outside force to keep us on track with new behaviors.  The more ingrained the old behavior, the more reinforcement we will need to enforce the new behaviors.
On a go forward basis, once you know the new behaviors you wish to see from yourself and your employees, consider how much self-discipline will be necessary and what reinforcement you will be able to maintain to make them happen.  Without those pieces you should reconsider your investment of time and resources.
Ask yourself this:  “Do I have the self-discipline and reinforcement in place to sustain these changes I wish to see?”

I-It vs. I-You. How are Sales Superstars created?

I-It = Viewing people solely as instruments to be used toward our own goals.  I am “I-It” when I care not at all about your feelings but only about what I want from you.

I-You = A special bond, an attuned closeness that is often-but of course not always-found between husbands and wives, family members, and good friends.

When we are in I-It mode we treat other people as means to an end.  In the I-You mode, our relationship with them becomes an end in itself.  (Daniel Goleman; Social Intelligence)

So, how are sales superstars created?  I-You and I-It is how.  Let’s define a sales superstar – an individual who consistently achieves above average revenue results while maintaining a role as a consummate team player and positive employee role model.  Would you like to have more of them?  Me too!

I-You and I-It cuts to the heart of this conversation.  In selling situations we can find ourselves on the wrong end of an I-It conversation.  The “I” is the prospect and the it, more often than not, is the sales person.  The salesperson feels objectified, disrespected, made to feel small, and often a second-class citizen.  That is what being “It” feels like.  Not something you want to do for a living.  It is unsustainable for most mere mortals.

The I-It is also a glass ceiling for sales superstar impostors.  These are the individuals who produce sheer numbers but tend to be a negative influence and suffer from “too-heavy-to-handle” ego.  They are the “I” and the company and clients are the “It.”  Meant to serve their own ends.  As you can imagine, this is also unsustainable.

I-You is the secret.  “I” actually care and am interested about “You,” regardless of any positive outcomes for me — where I ask questions that strike to the heart of problems that matter to you and are relevant.   Not, simply the problems that happen to be solved by my products or services.  The I-You is the person who legitimately cares about others, and in turn, others trust that person.  They should.  These are the gems that take a reasonably good sales team and turn them into super heros.

The great news, in most cases, is that this mindset can be trained to those willing to learn them.  Like anything else, there has to be a will to become better, and an authentic passion for what you are selling and the good it brings to clients.

Do you have a sincere interest in re-engineering the human side of your business?  Contact me.